cosmic cabdrivers 
guide to the universe

My Cosmic Pickup Truck- 2022 edition

The Cosmic Rat

This site freely provides information and ideas. There are no commercial transactions. 'Secure' status is neither relevant nor necessary..

RAT'S NEST: Things to Gnaw

to Greater Phoenix

TECHNO-RAT: Free Technology

My Other Site

Cosmicrat's Chronicles, Part 1
Cosmicrat's Chronicles, Part 2
Cosmicrat's Chronicles, Part 3

Cosmicrat's Chronicles, Part 4
Cosmicrat's Chronicles, Part 5


Wordpress Blog

Civatar Blogs


Yahoo360 (2006-2009)

Wordpress Blog Archive 2007

Archive (2007-2012)

CosmicRat OPERA Archive



The Cosmic Cabdrivers' Guide to the Universe, in its various sections and blog pages, is dedicated to providing useful information and stimulating thoughts, ideas, and humor for intelligent beings everywhere, seeking peace, justice, and equal prosperity for all. Contributions and feedback are welcome.
The obligation of a citizen does not end at the voting booth. --Barack Obama

But our obligation to act STARTS at the voting booth. Our duty to THINK about that action, to understand how essential it is, to understand how much is at stake for our nation, and for the world, comes long before that. DO NOT LISTEN to the misguided who tell you it doesn't matter, that there is no difference.


The people need to SPEAK OUT--to write, call, march; demonstrate! We must condemn bad policies and demand good ones. We need to to take control of foreign policy, not let it control us. Military and economic aggression must be stopped. Covert subversion must stop. Our domestic policies should reflect our ideals and influence the world by good examples of equality, empathy, and humanitarian justice.

Income inequality is still getting worse. Immigration is not reformed. Warmongers threaten diplomacy and make peace harder to achieve. Even basic gun control laws are blocked. American citizens are being denied voting and reproductive rights in many states. We are not doing nearly enough to promote clean energy and protect our climate, all because of obstructionist Republicans who are elected by voters controlled by prejudice and corporate propaganda, allowed to win by the apathy of the cynics.

the Dove of Peace
The Dove of Peace flies from site to site through as many countries as possible. Please help it make a line around the globe by taking it with you to your site, by giving it to someone for their site, by passing it on to another continent, or to the conflict areas of the world...
My thanks to Cosmic Rose


Remembering the sacrifices of our own citizens is not enough. We also need to remember those our country has killed in the wars we have waged.


Below are my most recent Rat Now articles. Those with only the title shown are available in PDF format, or shown in full on the NEST page. The link will take you there.


Months have passed, and Israel under Netanyahu has continued the barbaric and careless actions against Palestinians, and continues to refuse a cease-fire, despite UN resolutions and further orders by the International Court, and US and world pressure to behave and respect human rights.

It is true that logically, the US should end its support for Israel until its government can begin complying with humane international standards. That would not have an immediate effect on Netanyahu's defiance, but it could reduce the degree of blame and condemnation that the US, and Biden in particular, has been receiving.

Changing a long-held policy of alliance with Israel is difficult when US political opinions about it are widely divided, especially when a Presidential election approaches.

In this coming election, it is absolutely necessary for Biden to defeat Trump, not just for the survival of US democracy, but to prevent the disastrous foreign policy changes by Trump, who would be far worse for the Palestinian cause.

We need to understand that as we speak out in protest against Israeli policies, and NOT blame Joe Biden for it. His administration has done a great deal to use pressure and diplomacy to bring an end to the war.

Massacres, destruction, and forced hunger are anger-inducing. We SHOULD be furious at Israel. But it's important to direct that anger accurately, to avoid collateral political damage.
--June 15, 2024


South Africa has charged Israel with genocide for their mass slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza. The charges are correct and accurate. Read the document

It is ironic that Israel, a country formed as a refuge for Jews, including survivors of genocide, has become the perpetrator of genocide. Its prior unjust treatment of Palestinians is widely known, but the current wholesale slaughter of men, women, and children is unprecedented The US needs to revise its policy and strongly pressure the country to stop, and begin implementing a separate, independent, Palestinian state.


Those three words should never again come out of Trump's mouth. They will, of course, but he has no right to use them. The rule of law is the exact reason he has been indicted. It is the reason any perpetrator of an attempt to overthrow an election and subvert a Constitutional process should be indicted and tried in court, regardless whether the defendant is running for any office.


Putin's worst act is no longer helping Donald Trump win in 2016. It is now a ruthless, deadly, criminal invasion of Russia's neighboring country with the apparant intention of re-creating the Russian Empire. President Biden and our NATO allies are doing exactly the right thing, helping Ukraine as much as possible without escalating into a world war. But, all the support cannot stop the death and destruction wreaked on the Ukrainian people, who are valiantly fighting for their country's survival and independence.

Oddly, there are right-wingers who admire Putin and seem to be cheering him on, and making excuses for him. There are ALSO a few misguided leftists who want to blame NATO and American imperialism for PROVOKING Putin. Both are full of shit.

Added note: The entire bogus argument of the pseudo-leftists is that NATO being joined by small nations next to Russia angered Putin so extremely that he attacked Ukraine. They blame the US and NATO for making Putin so uncontrollably angry that he couldn't help it. So, by this logic, the road to peace is NEVER ANGERING anyone.

I think Mykola Riabchuk, a Ukrainian author and political analyst who was interviewed in the New Yorker said it best:
I don’t accept this formula about approaching closer and closer to Russia. They didn’t care about Russia. They didn’t approach Russia. The countries of Eastern Europe had their own problems, and their own was not nato moving to Russia; it was Eastern Europe moving away from Russia. So again, let’s call things by the proper names.

He points out NATO is NOT a threat to Russia, and Putin knows that. It only threatens his ambitions for imperial expansion.

Ukrainians deserve our support, whatever the cost. And, as we watch freedom and democracy being threatened abroad, we must also take care to guard our own from the dangerously autocratic Republican party, made worse than ever by the disastrous Trump presidency. Defeating that tyrant has not improved their character. Like Putin, they are desperate for power, and will stop at nothing to claw their way back.

Voting rights must become national law, as well as every democratic reform we can enact. Eliminate the filibuster, the Electoral College, and gerrymandering. It is possible to lose government by the people without firing a shot. It is also possible to preserve it. Let's do that.
--march 24, 2022

The Right To Keep And Bear Slaves

What does the Second Amendment to the US Constitution have to do with slavery? EVERYTHING! The 2nd Amendment was created to protect Southern slave-patrol militia. Southern states feared they would be disarmed and lose control of their slaves.

Home Dental Repair Forum

E-VAPOR: A Great Substitute for Smoking

The people should be the deciders! We should have a National Referendum for any proposed war or hostile military action.

Earth's latest data for atmospheric CO2
We are not winning the struggle to reduce excess carbon dioxide. It is getting worse, and climate change is already showing adverse consequences. Click above for more information.

Human population growth worldwide

It is the underlying cause for excessive CO2 pollution and poverty and hunger in many places. If Earth is to be our sustainable home for future generations, we must control our birth rate.
The US Census Population Clock shows current populations of the US and the world

Census data is important for another reason, here in the US, projecting FUTURE population numbers and categories. The GOOD news here is that we will be a more diverse country Minority populations often subject of prejudice and discrimination will, in a few decades, have a combined population greater than than the whie people now in the majority. This will make it much harder for white nationalists to have political power..
Projections of the Size and Composition of the U.S. Population: 2014 to 2060

Wikileaks, founded by Julian Assange, has contributed enormously to revealing truth that the public deserves and needs to know. It is perhaps the most important web phenomenon of the decade. Bradley (now Chelsea) Manning, nominee for the 2012 Nobel Peace Prize, revealed through Wikileaks video documentation of an incident in which American soldiers gunned down Reuters journalists in Iraq, and many documents which helped to fuel a worldwide discussion about American overseas engagements, civilian casualties of war, imperialistic manipulations, and rules of engagement.

Manning deserves lasting honor and respect for their courageous act.. President Obama rightly commuted their sentence. A full pardon would have been better.

Assange, essentially under house arrest in London, should be freed from the threat of prosecution. Whether one agrees or not with what is published, freedom of the press must be protected.

Assange, probably out of anger and frustration, allowed his once noble creation to be used to impact the 2016 election, which was not up to its past honorable principles.

Revealing what governments hide from their people, and making useful information free to the public are noble acts of journalism. Publishing private email to influence a democratic election is sleazy, and contributes to the worst tactics of political campaigning.

Wikileaks' past achievements should always be an inspiration for those dedicated to truth and freedom of information.

Through the Looking Glass Links to over 700 mirror sites for Wikileaks

Seattle, Washington... Phoenix Arizona
Edmonton, Alberta... Kansas City, Missouri.
St. Petersburg Florida... Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
London, England... Vilnius Lithuania,
Tel Aviv, Israel... Baghdad, Iraq
Beijing, China

Phoenix, Arizona, USA
(Home of CosmicRat)

St. Petersburg, Florida
Birthplace of CosmicRat)

Oslo, Norway
(A friendly, peaceful place)

Vilnius, Lithuania

Kabul, Afghanistan

Beijing, China

The Affordable Care Act represents the greatest advance in providing healthcare to Americans since Medicare. More improvements are needed, but in the meantime, use it, appreciate it, and tell your friends.

The two estimates below of Iraqi war deaths have different totals. The first, lower number is bad enough, considering the war was unjustifiable.. Read the explanations to decide which is more accurate.

Iraq Body Count
Iraq Deaths Estimator



The Hartmann Report

generalizations are false

The Trap of Individualism

The ideology that calls itself conservative often promotes policies and acts in ways that seem not to make sense, and use tactics without principles, except to win at any cost.

One thing that tells us is that the ideology is secondary to the purpose. Usually we think in terms of an ideal, or set of ideals, inspiring a plan of implementation. With conservatives, it is the opposite. Their motivation is simple: greed. The ideology is built around the purpose of allowing an elite minority to continue to exploit the majority, who they hope to convince is an acceptable state of affairs, or at least prevent from effectively offering resistance.

An article I recently read on the subject of the American gun culture and the promotion of the Second Amendment revealed some insight into a key aspect of the devious design of the manufactured ideological web, and how it serves them.

From 'Operation Wetback' to Newtown: Tracing the Hick Fascism of the NRA

The right to bear arms, an amendment that has been twisted loose from its original purpose, resulting in a heavily armed population in a society where that is not only useless but dangerous as well, serves to give gun owners a sense of personal power that is only an illusion. It turns them from a part of a society to a collection of individuals, distrusting other individuals, unable and unwilling to cooperate and organize with others to defend their common interests.

Individualism: It sounds like a very positive concept. We are all individuals, with the right to be ourselves, say what we like, and do things in our own, perhaps nonconformist, way.

But there is another side to individualism, and that is the side the conservatives use against us. Human beings are at their most effective when they work together to achieve common goals. That is the very basis of human civilization. Sharing our knowledge, discoveries, and effort is what built our fantastic advances in technology, science, and art. It has also enabled us to free ourselves from tyrannies.

Human beings would not exist today if we had not learned to cooperate. Every living being has a drive for self-preservation, but we and other social animals evolved an innate tendency toward group preservation. Individually, we are vulnerable; together, we survive and prosper. Empathy is a vital survival trait. We often help and protect others, at risk to ourselves. Groups in which members did not have that instinct usually failed.

Beyond mere survival, our social nature, as we developed our ability to communicate, share, and pass on knowledge and ideas to future generations, made us the dominant species we are today. Of course we don't all think alike or have the same abilities. Our individual nature is also important, resulting in new ideas, inventions, and specialization.

When our ancestors reached the point of building structures, devices, and organization enabling us to be reasonably sure of daily survival, some, having acquired more wealth than others, began to believe that they did not need the rest of society. They felt that their wealth and the power it enables made them independent of, and superior to, the majority of their fellow human beings.

This was an illusion then, as it is now. It not only ignores the history of collective human contributions to reach the current level, but the interdependent support of the entire population. This thought of being apart from the masses is nevertheless attractive because it seems to excuse the elite from responsibility for their impact on the rest of society.

It has never been too difficult for the ordinary people to realize that the wealthy elite at any point in history use their power to obtain much more than their fair share of available resources with little or no regard for those they exploit for material gain. The wealthy and powerful know this, and the cost of their position is to live with a degree of fear that their power will not protect them from a unified and purposeful mass of common people, once those people decide that inequality and injustice have gone too far.

In the past, alliance with an autocratic government was good insurance for the elite. It was the basis for feudalism, and, as industrialism developed, a marriage of state and corporate power, as in the British Empire, or fascism. The fascism of Nazi Germany was very attractive to some American capitalists, at least until the war made their advocacy 'politically incorrect'.

In a democracy, wealth and power must rely on two methods: direct financial influence on elected representatives and propaganda to influence the electorate. They have been quite successful with both in the US.

Perhaps the most insidious and effective themes of propaganda is the promotion of individualism as an ideal opposed to collective organization and action. With this twisted notion of opposing the two complementary traits which have actually together built our civilization, they seek to isolate each person from every other person.

As the above linked article points out, the individual 'right' to own and carry firearms, no matter how unnecessarily deadly, gives the owner the illusion of personal power and independence, while increasing his level of distrust and fear of every other person, especially if there are perceivable differences between them.

Those who attempt to organize people for collective action are portrayed as wanting to rob others of their individuality. Naturally the excesses of communist governments fed into this line of propaganda for many years, and was so pervasive that it is still useful.

The propaganda seeks to label any idea but unregulated capitalism as 'communist' or 'socialist'. Over the last 40+ years the definitions have been escalated to the point of attacking the reforms by Roosevelt and those who followed him that actually saved capitalism from itself.

Even democracy has been attacked, both rhetorically and tactically by those seeking to limit the right to vote. Democracy is, after all, the ultimate in collective, cooperative action. It enables the majority, who are not rich and powerful, to limit the priveleges of the 1% to control their lives.

Health Boundaries Bite
Health boundaries can permanently impair and range from misdiagnoses to stress.

What does SOCIALISM mean in the US?

There will be deliberate confusion and misinformation spread by Trump and the right-wing Republicans who support him. A clear idea of what Democratic Socialism, or Social Democracy, means, and what it does not mean, should be kept in mind by everyone.

Using the word SOCIALISM does not mean that Democrats are much further to the left on the political scale. In fact, Republicans have gone MUCH further to the right, while Democrats continue to support equality and the common people. But for too long, socialism has been used as an epithet, a negative accusation, by the right wing, and it is time that its meaning be understood.

Most advanced economies, including the US, have a blend of socialism and capitalism in their economic systems. Private enterprise operates with capitalism. Businesses where competition exists, and where consumers can compare before buying, generally do no public harm. The competition usually serves to keep them accountable in price and quality. Democratic Socialists do not seek to change that.

As we know, some services are best done by the government on behalf of the people. Others, if provided by private companies, must be tightly regulated by the government because they are practical monopolies, or because competition does not serve to self-regulate them. Some products and services, even when competition controls prices, must be regulated for public safety.

Naturally, we have a degree of socialism in the US, but in some areas it is lacking compared with the ideal found in most advanced economies. In particular, health care, for which almost every developed country has a government-based system to insure access by their citizens, has been seriously deficient for decades in the US. The ACA greatly expanded insurance coverage, but depends too heavily on private insurance companies. As a result we still pay more for health care than any other nation, yet rank far behind in health outcome.

Higher education has become far too expensive, making it accessible only to the wealthy or via huge loans that burden students for many years afterward, and result in having to choose high-income occupations to study for, even if they were not the primary interest or ability of the student.

Problems such as these are the focus of Democratic Socialism. It does not replace or impair the capitalist portion of the economy, which does not and cannot solve these issues. It is the task of a government of the people to protect the vulnerable and disadvantaged among us.

Capitalism by itself creates a society in which a relative few become very wealthy, and a majority range from moderate incomes to extreme poverty. The disparity between these groups becomes wider with time. In the past, this has led to a desire to do away with capitalism altogether, but what has worked best has been to find the right balance between socialism and capitalism

It is our goal to create that proper balance, using means that have been proven to work in other successful countries, adapting them to work harmoniously in our own. Enabling all of us to have access to health care and education will not only benefit those with lower incomes, but also produce a much healthier and better educated nation for us all.


Human beings have been around for about 200,000 years. Compared to many of our fellow animal species, we are not physically very impressive, yet we not only survived but thrived, expanding our numbers almost everywhere on Earth.

We didn't achieve that by stubbornly refusing to change how and where we lived in the face of the many challenges. Changing to adapt has been our secret to success.

Fortunately, it was not until after we had developed civilization and technology to the point where some felt invincible to life's hazards, that the concept of conservatism was invented.

Naturally enough, those who felt safer and wealthier than most, did not want anything to change. Sometimes they succeeded in preventing change for a time, until events or the less fortunate demanded it. When conservatives gain too much power, they can become an impediment to survival, not only their own but everyone else's too.

That's right, conservatives are a handicap to human survival. That is not to say that being cautious and carefully planning changes is a problem. That is not what conservatives do. They impede all progress that they believe contrary to their self-interest of grasping wealth and power.

This country has needed significant change for years. Progressive leaders and members of the public have long advocated it. We have fallen behind many other free democracies.

One of the biggest problems has been our medical care non-system, consisting of a disorganized collection of health professionals, profit-seeking insurance companies and providers of equipment and medicine, serving the acquisition of wealth, but not so much those who need the care. This situation in normal times impoverishes the non-wealthy when they have serious illness, causing more personal bankruptcy than any other problem. Preventative care is often skipped due to the cost. Despite spending more than any other country, we are a less healthy nation as a result.

But the other problem of our non-system becomes most evident when there is a virus pandemic like we now have. Without a national health authority, there can be little preparation for emergencies. Future needs are not profitable until the need arises. There is no way to mandate the stockpiling of supplies, equipment, and hospital rooms that, when epidemics occur are needed immediately.

A Federal health agency with the power to assure such preparedness is needed, along with a system to share the cost of health care among all, assuring that all in need can be treated.

We like progress
The capacity of humanity to innovate and embrace change is undeniable. The advent of computers, the internet, and cellphone networks are obvious evidence. We lived without them once, but now consider them almost indispensable.

And, now that there is an urgent need for physical distance from one another, we are seeing that technology that was only convenient and fun becoming an essential tool that allows us to be social without touching, and for many to work without leaving home.

Using these systems, and adding innovations to them, we can maintain distances needed for health for extended periods without becoming frustrated and lonely. We can enjoy virtual interaction without practical limitation.

The more difficult problem to solve is to maintain work-based income in businesses that depend on physical proximity-- restaurants, theaters, sports events, concerts, public transportation, etc. Having to shut down most of these activities puts many out of work. And we must avoid the temptation to re-commence them prematurely.

Clearly a safety net needs to be implemented for as long as required. There is no need to allow excessive financial hardship in addition to the danger from the virus. Continued income will maintain consumer demand for goods and services that can still be provided.

We should look for alternative projects to provide employment in activities that can continue safely. This would be an excellent time to repair and improve our infrastructure, to build new carbon-free energy installations.

Some might consider it outrageously disproportionate that a an organism much too tiny to see can change an enormous nation. Yet we know that viruses, bacteria, insects are parts of the forces of nature, just as powerful as earthquakes, hurricanes, and tidal waves in their own way.  We, too, as part of humanity, are a force of nature, changing the global climate by our collective acts.

The tiny virus has changed America already, and we may think it a temporary adaptation, but it has awakened us to the need for permanent change.

It has been written that the virus has called our bluff.  Those who believed that we could exist sustainably as a loose collection of individuals, wavering between cooperation and independent disregard of the whole, have seen our vulnerability exposed.

Those who thought leadership didn't matter, that any idiot could be President, and managed to elect such an idiot, are, along with the rest of us, reaping the chaos they sowed.

If this virus doesn't teach us that we need to cooperate ALL the time, not just when danger threatens, then perhaps nothing will.
--cosmicrat  March 25, 2020


It is a positive trend to de-statue the villains of history. There is no question that we need not and should not honor the dishonorable, those whose claim to fame was the harm done to their country and its people in their time. No one who fought to keep slavery is worthy of a statue, nor is anyone whose main accomplishment was furthering the genocide of Native Americans.

The question of those who did both right and wrong, as human beings often do, may be less clear. Those who helped secure freedom from England and formed a country with a claim to high ideals deserve our thanks for that, but if they enslaved people and designed a government that preserved slavery, they deserve to be condemned for that. Their entire stories should be told. But, do they deserve to be venerated as a national icon? Probably not. If their statues are left in place, plaques should be added to explain their mixed legacies.

Erecting monuments is an understandable impulse. Sometimes they comemmorate events, sometimes ideals. Sculptures of the human form may represent the artist's concept of beauty, but when they are of a particular human, we should wonder why, if the art itself fails to answer that question.

We might wish to remember Lyndon Johnson, who signed into law the Civil Rights and Voting Rights laws, and who tried to fight poverty. Yet he is the same man who waged a needless war that killed over a million human beings. Could a statue represent both sides of LBJ? Unlikely.

Even when we try to iconify ideals, we need to remember that they are aspirations, not accomplishments. The Statue of Liberty represents the highest of our national principles, and it has indeed symbolized a freer life for millions of immigrants, yet liberty is denied or incomplete for far too many, whether born here or elsewhere.

If that statue reminds us that there is much liberating yet to be done, it is serving its purpose. Perhaps we should also erect a Statue of Equality.

--cosmic rat June 30, 2020

Chomsky on Civil Liberties, Obama and the Future of Progressive Politics by STEVEN DUREL

GASOLINE PRICES 2005-2011 -A reference to refute Republican lies.

River Bend Blog The real story from inside Iraq

STOPPING DESPOTISM--the Al Gore speech
An eloquent and insightful statement about the danger from the Bush Administration.

An unpleasant job, but someone has to do it.

People and politicians alike knew the truth then. Why didn't that help?

VOTE COSMICRATIC We need one world government.

Did the government learn nothing from the failed Nixon assasination attempt?

RAT'S NEST: Things to Gnaw

to Greater Phoenix

TECHNO-RAT: Free Technology

My Other Site


Wordpress Blog

Civatar Blogs


Yahoo360 Blog Archive (2006-2009)

Wordpress Blog Archive from 2007

RAT'S MULTIPLY Blog Archive (2007-2012)

CosmicRat OPERA Archive (2012-2013)

SHMOOZEZONE Archive (2012-2021)
Blogs saved from a dying blog site.


RAT NOW, continued


I have written before about the hard-core Republican opposition to the democratic system, beginning many years ago. It is not a new idea of theirs. Prior to the Trump era, they overtly attacked it only once, in 1933, the coup attempt against FDR.

In online discussions, some would call democracy mob rule, and make the absurd claim that we have a republic, not a democracy, ignoring the fact that it is both-- the two terms are not exclusive. Republic merely defines any state that is not a kingdom It is a designation used loosely by a wide variety of government systems.

Confused as their rhetoric is, it reveals the way they think. They believe they deserve to exert their authority, and will not hesitate to pervert, weaken, and eliminate the democratic system to do so.

It was a group of wealthy individuals and corporate heads that conspired to attempt the overthrow of FDR. They called it The Business Plot. Thanks to General Smedley Butler, they failed.

The Republican party is controlled by wealthy and corporate power today. The second coup attempt in US history on January 6, 2021, also failed, but they have not given up.

Democracy is vulnerable to partisan control of elections, including the power to decide to overturn election results, to suppress unwanted voters, and gerrymander districts. These strategoes need to be prohibited by law if we are to keep American democracy.
December 14, 2021


It isn't every day that a President can honestly say: Not only was my decision correct, it was even correcter than I thought. That was undeniably the case with President Biden's decision to withdraw from Afghanistan. The speed and ease of the Taliban takeover, which has prompted some of the confused humanitarians, as well as the hawks, to criticize him, leaves no doubt that we have not built an Afghan nation in 20 years. It was a fiction.

Neither the government, the army that we trained and equipped, nor the people themselves believed the fiction. That became immediately obvious.

We have had more than enough fiction thrown at us, especially by the Trump administration. Biden has promised us truth, and he has fulfilled that promise. The Afganistan fiction began long before Trump, and everyone who failed to end the war over the last 20 years should be criticized for knowingly perpetuating the lie, but the worst culprit was Bush, at the start. Bush committed the United States to building a new Afghan state and army.

When the United States invaded in 2001, Bush could have stuck to getting Osama bin Laden and al-Qaeda. In December 2001 , the Taliban, wanted to make a deal with the Karzai government the US created.. Bush (and Cheney) rejected the offer, and chose nation-building.

The messiness of US withdrawal from Afghanistan demonstrates why wars are much easier to start than to end. It is also making it absolutely clear that withdrawing is the right thing to do.
Every needless war the US has started, which includes ALL the wars since World War 2 ended, have been absurdly easy to start. None of them have even required an honest reason. A few lies and exaggerations have sufficed every time. Once a needless war is underway, even a new President who wants to end it faces a variety of arguments why it should continue, such as We haven't won yet, but we've spent money and lives... Hardly anyone wants to admit that we're NOT going to win. Yes, troops will have died for NOTHING. That's the nature of a needless war.

The longer we occupy and control a foreign country, more or less changing its government to suit our preferences, the more of our supporters there will be disappointed and endangered when we leave. That problem was created by those who started and conducted the war, not the President who finally ended it. The very fact that the same forces that were in power 20 years ago will be in power after we leave tells us that we need to leave, and that we never should have been there.

The Taliban BRIBED the government and its troops to surrender. They were willing to take the money and run, not because they liked the Taliban, not just because they needed the money, but because they had been the US puppets long enough to know it just didn't feel right. They weren't proud of themselves. They had never been self-motivated revolutionaries trying to overthrow the Islamists on their own. They were domestic mercenaries for a foreign force.

Once again, Smedley Butler was proven right. War is a racket. The military establishment, the State Department, and the military contractors all knew Afghanistan was a house of cards, and chose to pretend otherwise to keep the money flowing, and to avoid the embarrassing admission that it was a prolonged blunder.

The Trump assault on our system of government has wielded a unique weapon: the denial of reality, with an unprecedented proliferation of prevarication. Ejection of its author will not make the effects disappear from the minds of the affected.

The War on Truth

Back to Reality


Americans must and will always protest injustice, abuse of power, and denial of human rights. (PDF)

It's History

Those words are often said to mean It's over and done with. It belongs to the past.
But that isn't the right way to look at history. The story of human events is not a mere collection of isolated facts. It is a live, connected flow of human actions and words and motives, each affecting the next. The past, both known and unknown, touches us, making us what we are, guiding what happens next.
We need to know history, or we will constantly be surprised, not so much by what will happen, but WHY it will. Yet teachers of history, writers of books, and keepers of records often lie, or omit important parts, to handicap our understanding.
We are usually taught the history that makes our country and its leaders look good. That is the least important part. The mistakes, the crimes, and the secrets are what we need to know about.

The point is not to make everyone a cynic, thinking that all leaders lie or have bad motives. It is to learn the truth about the rights and wrongs, the wise and honest, the inept and deceptive. Elaborate imagined conspiracy theories come from knowing too little, not from learning too much.

Here is one example, a mostly-unheard story of the first Iraq invasion.
Highway of Death
...over 60 miles of coastal Highway 8 from Kuwait to Iraq, a division of the Iraq's Republican Guard withdrew on Feb. 26-27, 1991.
Baghdad radio had just announced Iraq's acceptance of a cease-fire proposal and, in compliance with UN Resolution 660, retreating Iraqi troops were ordered to withdraw to positions held before Aug. 2, 1990.
'U.S. planes trapped the long convoys by disabling vehicles in the front, and at the rear, and then pounded the resulting traffic jams for hours,' says Joyce Chediac, a Lebanese-American journalist. 'It was like shooting fish in a barrel,' one U.S. pilot said.
This was Iraq invasion #1, that was supposedly justified. Iraq's invasion of Kuwait, done because Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq, happened after Sadaam told the US Ambassador his plan, and he was told the US wouldn't interfere.

We all know Bush #2 lied to start a war with Iraq, but so did his father. It seems to be a family trait.

Sometimes what is left out of history is not what happened but what might have happened
If Winston Churchill had gotten his way, World War Two might not have ended the way it did, but continued against the USSR. Operation Unthinkable
Churchill ordered his Generals to come up with a plan. They added up the numbers, and showed him. The Russians had a much bigger army and more figher planes than the Allies, and would have almost certainly won easily.
Of course the idea was abandoned, but Stalin learned of Churchill's intentions, making the Cold War inevitable.

From 1945 to 2003, the United States attempted to overthrow more than 40 foreign governments, and to crush more than 30 populist-nationalist movements fighting against intolerable regimes. In the process, the US bombed some 25 countries, caused the end of life for several million people, and condemned many millions more to a life of agony and despair.
--William Blum
US Foreign Policy

--cosmic rat, Jan. 5, 2015

More articles:

Rat's Nest

Our ability to use the democratic tools available to us is constrained only by the opposition of the propagandized. The best thing any of us can do is to teach someone to think.

-cosmicrat December 23, 2012


We hear the word "crisis" often lately. The meaning of that word depends on the context in which it is used. When Trump uses it, it means This is an issue I can use to appeal to my base, so I'm going to mention it a lot, and lie about it.

A crisis created by unscrupulous politicians for political advantage can hasten a real crisis, one whose meaning is more like, We have reached a crossroads in public policy, and we need to decide now which way to turn.
We DO need to turn, because the current policy toward immigrants is doing us great harm.

The way we act, and react, toward immigrants, especially refugees reveals our national face to the world. There is no clearer or more globally visible evidence of what kind of people we are. What diplomats and leaders express to one another about friendship and good intentions are only words. It is how we greet the strangers, the ordinary people, who come to our doors, that we can be fairly judged on. It is not enough to say what we will NOT do, and should not do. Separating parents and children, imprisoning people who have nothing wrong but ask for asylum, publicly insulting them-- no one should be doing those things. We know we don't want a "wall"-- a symbolic un-welcome sign.

It is absurd that a country as large, prosperous, and powerful as ours would have to appear inadequate to handle a few thousand asylum seekers without acting overwhelmed. We need plans, organization, and personnel on a scale equal to the need, to welcome, process, check backgrounds, and make decisions about people and families asking to enter.

This processing needs to be done in a courteous and pleasant manner, and completed efficiently and fairly in a short period of time. The world's richest country can build facilities and employ qualified people to do this. It would be a sound investment in our image to the world, of benefit to international relations, as well as assuring that the labor needs of American employers are met.

Far from being any sort of “danger”, the vast majority of immigrants are a valuable benefit to our economy and our society. They always have been.

The Right to Migrate

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

The issue of so-called illegal immigration has produced an interesting political alignment, not quite like that produced by other important issues. The climate of fear that has been encouraged by Bush neoconservatives in order to push their agenda of Presidential dictatorial power, and offensive use of military force, and world domination has also resulted in a wave of xenophobia, seen in the Dubai Ports furor and an anti-immigration stance by a variety of confused caucasians. Normally the power-seeking Bush Republicans would jump right into the reactionary camp just as they did with the theocracy-seeking religious extremists, but it happens that many influential business interests need the 'illegal immigrants' to stay right where they are, working hard for low wages. So, we have an odd alliance between big business and a very large number of Americans with Hispanic heritage, who naturally sympathize with the immigrants, and millions of others who believe that America stands for the principles inscribed on the Statue of Liberty.

The xenophobes have little of substance on their side. Proposals to wall off the borders and to make illegal entry a felony are simply absurd. Where would we imprison these millions of newly created felons, even if we caught them? Concentration camps?

Perhaps the newly mobilized supporters of immigration will help focus on the most important human side of the controversy. The business interests are not perfect allies, because they would prefer immigration remain illegal but mostly unenforced. That way, immigrants will continue to accept low pay and keep a low profile, fearing to organize or complain.

Those who make an issue of the illegality of immigration are only playing semantic games. Any sensible person knows the difference between real crime and artificially created crime. The problem is not the immigrants. The problem is the law that declares them illegal. The law not only subjects the immigrants to needless hardship and victimization and keeps them outside the law, it makes any real border security impossible.

Business interests will no doubt resist legalization as much as felonization, since a legal immigrant could be protected by labor laws and not as easily exploited. But Americans who care about social justice and who envision our country as a liberator, not an oppressor, of mankind will make their views known and work toward opening our borders to all who come in peace to seek a better life.


One of the biggest mistakes made by early Communists was making atheism part of their political philosophy, and, once they acheived power, requiring it. Though athiesm is logically correct, attempting to suppress religion was tactically a bad idea.

"Religion is the opiate of the masses", said Karl Marx. In fact, religion is used to support capitalism. It was used to excuse slavery. It has been used to promote the most murderous and dishonest Presidential administration America ever had-- that of George W. Bush. [Note: That was true when I wrote it, but the title of worst and most dishonest now belongs to defeated Donald Trump] But religion has always been used by governments in power, whatever their philosophy. It is simply reinterpreted to fit the occasion.

Not everyone buys the official interpretation. Religious groups worked to end slavery, and have fought against exploitation of the poor. The religion is incidental. How people treat their fellow humans is determined by their character.

By abolishing religion, the Communists hoped to immunize the working class against the use of it by the capitalists to pacify and propagandize them. But what they overlooked is that you can't free people by force. Each person must abandon irrational beiliefs on his or her own, through indepenent thinking and reasoning.

If you tell people they can't believe something, they will believe it in secret. If you ban a book, they will believe you're hiding something and they will be sure to find it and read it.

In order to promote and institute asystem designed to provide economic equality and justice, you need to get and maintain the support of the people. To make an issue of religion is divisive and is certain to create am opposition totally unrelated to the purpose of the political movement. The main objection to Communism in the minds of most people living outside (and probably inside) of Communist governments is the lack freedom, including religious freedom.

Why should it be necessary for a Communist government to restrict religious and intellectual freedom? If the central purpose of Communism is a fair and just economic system, should that not stand on its own merit? If it works, then it would be embraced and copied elsewhere. If it doesn't, then no amount of repression is going to change that.

Communism has failed in practice because it tried to fight two revolutions at once. The second one, aimed at 'perfecting' human thought, was entirely unnecessary, and doing it by force is impossible. That created an opposition that was far more powerful and lasting than the capitalists, It was the factor that hampered cooperation by citizens, and it was the source of popular opposition from outside, in the rest of the world.

It was unnecessary to attack religion. Although 'conservative' sects, even today, support capitalism, right-wing authoritarianism, and even war, there is nothing inherent in any major religion's basic message to justify this. In fact, religious scriptures tend to favor human brotherhood and compassion for the less fortunate.

One might think that over the years Communist leaders would have realized the mistake. Some probably did, but by then it had developed into an orthodoxy that was as rigid as any religious dogma. Unable to change, it only became more repressive and stifled freedom of thought, alienating most of its most valuable potential supporters.

I have heard little public discussion about what happened to what was formerly the main opposition to corporate imperialism. Though many were relieved at the presumed end of the Cold War, it left a power vacuum, and a philosophical vacuum as well. As flawed as Communism was in practice, it represented an idealism of theory and purpose. The struggle now seems to be between the powerful and the powerless, with neither side displaying much principled behavior.

What is needed now is not another ideology to fight over, but a cohesive concept to which people of all nations and cultures might come peaceably, without coercion. It must neither use nor try to suppress religion. It must show the way to economic justice while encouraging intellectual freedom, tolerance, and allow all nonharmful action as well.

Any ideas?



My web design philosophy is to emphasize compatibility with all browsers, keeping it simple and quick to load, yet pleasing to the eye. I am availible to design or improve your site at a reasonable fee. The main purpose of this site is to inform and verbally entertain. I oppose any web programming used to trap browsers in commercial sites, or crash a viewer's browser or computer for any reason, or to make viewing unnecessarily difficult by those with slower computers and modems and/or limited hard-drive space.

Cosmic Cabdrivers' Guide (

Is a non-profit, non-commercial domain, created to inform and entertain. Any use of an email address with this domain name on any commercial mass mailing is done fraudently and without permission of this webmaster

edition C1.8, ratdate 202308.31

Beginning 201111.20 transitioned to my new hosting server,, made necessary by failure of to continue to fulfill its expected function as a provider of webspace.
If you encounter any errors, please let me know. I am always in the process of improving
and updating everything, and I welcome your feedback.
Note: Due to the fact that email spammers are giving canned meat products a bad name, I have eliminated automatic email links.
Look for the graphic representation of my email address. Then just type it in on your emailer

History:ESTABLISHED IN 2002. Former ISP's/webhosts include, NBCI/xoom, and Diaup became useless due to a poor Quest phone signal. (cable) was adequate but overpriced...
Progress marches on
~~~captain rat.